MDP

MDP guideline extraction preview

Generated 2026-07-23T00:46:21Z
Private extraction preview. Supporting context is internal only.

Screening for potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care: Canadian guideline.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026

accepted 2support found 2
Executive Summary

This Canadian guideline addresses the clinical problem of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), also known as medication overload, in older adult outpatients. It is intended for use by family physicians, other primary care providers, and their patients in outpatient settings. The document covers the implementation of structured prescription checkups or related PIP interventions to optimize medication appropriateness, as well as recommendations for government funding to support these services.

The guidance is specifically geared toward adults aged 65 years or older, and it does not apply to independent reviews conducted by community pharmacies. The recommendations are based on evidence that PIP interventions can reduce the number of medications and potentially lower the risk of hospitalization and death, though the optimal frequency of these interventions and their long-term effects remain uncertain. The guideline complements existing resources on deprescribing specific medication classes, such as proton pump inhibitors and sedative hypnotics.

Recommendation 2 foundGrade / class
1acceptedsupport foundPage 3
We recommend adults aged 65 years or older receive prescription checkups or a related potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) intervention to optimize medication appropriateness. Effective interventions include medication reviews paired with suggestions by a prescriber or pharmacist using a structured approach or set of rules
Grade / classstrong recommendation, moderate-certainty evidence
Internal only3 supporting context passages
issuer explanationPage 3

Our dedicated systematic review of 118 randomized controlled trials found that interventions reduce the number of medicines (standardized mean difference [SMD]=–0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.38 to –0.13; I²=90%; n=16,174); may slightly reduce hospitalizations, although the difference is not statistically significant (relative risk [RR]=0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.02; I²=45%; n=57,636); and may slightly reduce all-cause mortality, although the difference is not statistically significant (RR=0.94; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.04; I²=0; n=16,682). Interventions may result in little to no difference regarding adverse reactions that are not serious, injurious falls, quality of life, outpatient visits, and emergency department visits.²⁴ For medicines requiring monitoring for withdrawal effects, PIP interventions may temporarily (and appropriately) increase the number of outpatient visits.²⁴ Our dedicated systematic review of 9 controlled studies found that interventions were at least as acceptable to patients as usual care, with similar patient satisfaction ratings as usual care (SMD=0.45; 95% CI –0.14 to 1.04; I²=96%; n=4414) and an increased rate of discussions about stopping medicines (RR=4.32, 95% CI 0.0 to 56,270; I²=43%; n=429), which we considered an indicator of patient acceptability.²⁵ We made a strong, rather than weak or conditional, recommendation after considering patient values and preferences together with the effects of PIP interventions from the 2 dedicated systematic reviews. Patients prefer to stop taking medicines that are not needed when safe to do so and PIP interventions safely reduce the number of medicines while potentially reducing the risk of hospitalization and death. No substantial or irreversible harms of PIP interventions were identified, and patients may be more satisfied with PIP interventions compared with usual care, even though they require time and effort. Without PIP interventions, patients are likely to continue taking PIMs that should be stopped; as such, implementing PIP interventions tends to avoid unhelpful health care that can cascade and escalate after other screening (eg, screening for cancer). In this respect, PIP interventions are antithetical to other forms of screening. According to our review, the benefits clearly outweigh harms or downsides, and it appears most informed patients would want to be offered PIP interventions.

implementation detailPage 4

providers.24 The different types of interventions included in our systematic reviews did not appear to have substantially different effects based on sensitivity analyses, although the main purpose of the knowledge synthesis was not to compare interventions directly.24 Structured approaches are also called implicit interventions, in which a provider reviews a patient’s medicines (eg, to ensure each is indicated) and relies on clinical judgment. Approaches that use a set of rules are also called explicit interventions because medication lists are reviewed for specific enumerated medications or medication combinations. The selection of a particular intervention to implement could be governed by available resources such as the availability of a pharmacist and the use of electronic health records. Reviews by prescribers may be the easiest to implement in some settings, but they require additional supports for prescribers who may have limited time for implementation. Examples of studied interventions are provided in the tool for providers (Appendix 1, available from CFPlus*).

implementation detailPage 4

The ideal frequency of offering or applying interventions has not been clearly established based on studies. Considering the potential for stopped medicines to be restarted, and the benefit and feasibility of repeatedly offering or applying the intervention, an interval of 1 to 2 years might be reasonable. Additionally, interventions should be offered or applied whenever there is a substantial change in health status, such as a diagnosis of a new condition treatable with medications, hospital discharge, or admission to a long-term care facility. The recommendation applies to patients taking any number of medicines. Although patients in the included studies were typically taking more than 5 medicines, some were taking only 1, and the studied interventions sometimes identified potential prescribing omissions that could have applied to patients taking no medications. The benefits of the interventions may be greater in patients taking more medications, and it may be reasonable to offer or apply interventions more frequently to patients taking 5 or more medications. In practice, this could be operationalized by focusing on older patients who are more likely to experience polypharmacy.

2acceptedsupport foundPage 3
We recommend that governments fund prescription checkups or related interventions to optimize medication appropriateness
Grade / classstrong recommendation, moderate-certainty evidence
Internal only3 supporting context passages
issuer explanationPage 4

Because interventions involve the process of deprescribing, which is separate from prescribing or medication reconciliation, we recommend specific funding for PIP interventions. A cost-effectiveness systematic review of 13 PIP interventions found that all but 1 (which involved 2 home visits by a pharmacist) were cost-effective.29 Most were cost-saving, with savings being driven by avoided direct medication costs and reduced hospitalizations in some studies, with a maximum cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of $40,846 (below the usual cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY).29 The costs of implementing PIP interventions depended on the type of intervention, the country, and the existing resources in the setting.30 For example, a trial of clinical medication reviews found that an intervention costing €199 per patient resulted in €181 lower total health care costs (including the cost of the intervention) per patient compared to usual care.31

implementation detailPage 4

Health care provider time constraints are an important barrier to implementation, especially in settings with few family physicians and other primary care providers. Implementation of the main recommendation could be facilitated by providing funding to prescribers specifically for deprescribing and related care (eg, managing withdrawal effects), “parachuting” in clinical pharmacists from outside the usual care team, as is done in some of the included studies, or funding and supporting software-based PIP interventions. Information and education for patients and the public may promote the implementation of our main recommendation. PIP interventions would ideally be implemented as part of a pan-Canadian strategy on appropriate medication use and taken up by provincial, territorial, and federal governments. Implementing our guidance relies on effective and timely communication of information on prescriptions between providers and institutions; this is something that is currently time consuming, slow, and incomplete.

implementation detailPage 4

The immediate and longer-term effects of PIP interventions should be tracked. This can be done by individual providers or institutions as part of quality improvement efforts, by provincial or territorial governments using health administrative data, and by the federal government as part of its national strategy.

SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2019).

Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020

accepted 0held 35support found 25needs review 35
Executive Summary

This SEOM clinical guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The scope encompasses localized and advanced disease, including metastatic RCC, with a focus on histologic subclassification and molecular biology.

The guideline is intended for medical oncologists and addresses treatment strategies across various prognostic risk groups, including the use of surgery, systemic therapies, and active surveillance. Major recommendation domains include diagnostic staging, surgical interventions, adjuvant therapy, first-line and subsequent systemic treatments for metastatic disease, and management of non-clear cell RCC histologies.

Recommendation 35 foundGrade / class
1heldsupport foundPage 3
• CT scan is the gold standard for staging of RCC. Level of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: A.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: A
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 2

Diagnosis is usually suggested by abdominal ultrasound (US) but abdominal Computed Tomography scan (CT) represents the gold standard for the assessment of primary tumour extension: local invasiveness, venous involvement, locoregional lymph nodes status or adrenal metastases.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
2heldsupport foundPage 3
• Abdominal MRI is an alternative in several circum- stances. Level of evidence: III. Grade of recommenda- tion: C.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommenda- tion: C
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 3

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not recommended for routine clinical practice but may provide additional infor-mation on venous involvement by tumour thrombus. How-ever, for tumours sized ≤ 20 mm in diameter, gadolinium-enhanced sequences with fat saturation have been shown to be more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT [7].

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The recommendation wording could not be classified safely.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
3heldsupport foundPage 3
• The use of bone scan or brain CT (or MRI) is not recom- mended for routine clinical practice. Level of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: D.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: D
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 3

Most brain and bone metastases are symptomatic at diag-nosis. Therefore, bone scan is not performed routinely and will only be requested if there is a serum alkaline phos-phatase (ALP) elevation or bone pain. CT or MRI of the brain will be performed if there are clinical signs or symp-toms suggestive of M1.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The recommendation wording could not be classified safely.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
4heldsupport foundPage 4
• In patients without previous tumour diagnosis, a renal tumour core biopsy is recommended before treatment with ablative therapies, as well as in patients with meta- static disease before starting systemic treatment.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: A
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 4

partial nephrectomy is not possible. Ablative proce-dures (ablation, microwave ablation or cryoablation) are options in development for elderly patients or those with high surgical risk, and for multiple bilateral tumours as in hereditary RCC. Renal biopsy is recommended to con-firm malignancy if surgery is not going to be performed [21]. For T2–T4 tumours (> 7 cm) a radical nephrectomy

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The same source block was both returned and excluded and needs review.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
5heldsupport foundPage 4
• In patients without previous tumour diagnosis, a renal tumour core biopsy is recommended before treatment with ablative therapies, as well as in patients with meta- static disease before starting systemic treatment. Level of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: A.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: A
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 4

partial nephrectomy is not possible. Ablative proce-dures (ablation, microwave ablation or cryoablation) are options in development for elderly patients or those with high surgical risk, and for multiple bilateral tumours as in hereditary RCC. Renal biopsy is recommended to con-firm malignancy if surgery is not going to be performed [21]. For T2–T4 tumours (> 7 cm) a radical nephrectomy

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
6heldsupport foundPage 5
- Partial nephrectomy is recommended in T1 tumours, if technically feasible, as well as in bilateral tumours or a single functional kidney.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: I. Grade of recommendation: A
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 5

Localized disease T1 tumors Partial nephrectomy if technically feasible, in bilateral tumors or a single functional kidney (I, A)

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
7heldsupport foundPage 5
- Radical nephrectomy is recommended in T2-4 tumours.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: II. Grade of recommendation: A
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 5

T2-4 tumors Radical nephrectomy (II, A)

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
8heldsupport foundPage 5
- Adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy is not generally recommended
Grade / classLevel of evidence: I, Grade of recommendation: A
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 5

Adjuvant therapy is not generally recommended (I, A) However, treatment with sunitinib over 1-year could be an option in patients with high risk feaures (II, D; insufficient evidence) Fig. 1 Treatment algorithm in localized disease Initial active surveillance is also an acceptable alternative in elderly or high-risk patients with small renal masses (<3 cm) [23, 24]. Patients should be followed with repeated abdominal imaging every 3–6 months [19]. Several different classifications have been proposed to assess the risk of recurrence in patients with localized renal cell cancer treated with nephrectomy [19, 20]. Regarding the role of systemic therapies in localized tumours, several randomized trials failed to demonstrate a consistent reduction in progression-free survival or OS, either with 1-year adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib (ASSURE), pazopanib (PROTECT), axitinib (ATLAS), or 3-year sorafenib (SORCE) [25–30]. Only one study (S-TRAC) has shown a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) in patients who received adjuvant sunitinib for 1 year. This benefit seems to be especially apparent in the group of patients with higher risk features. Mature OS data are not available yet. Moreover, toxicity of sunitinib was considerable in this population [25]. However, differences in population prognostic features and dose intensity of therapy between both studies are remarkable [26, 27]. The European Medicines Agency has not approved adjuvant therapy due to the imbalance between risk and clinical benefit of these drugs.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
9heldsupport foundPage 5
Adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy is not generally recommended (Level of evidence: I, Grade of recommendation: A); however, treatment with 1-year sunitinib could be individually considered in patients with high-risk fea- tures (Level of evidence I, Grade of recommendation: D).
Grade / classnone printed
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 5

Adjuvant therapy is not generally recommended (I, A) However, treatment with sunitinib over 1-year could be an option in patients with high risk feaures (II, D; insufficient evidence) Fig. 1 Treatment algorithm in localized disease Initial active surveillance is also an acceptable alternative in elderly or high-risk patients with small renal masses (<3 cm) [23, 24]. Patients should be followed with repeated abdominal imaging every 3–6 months [19]. Several different classifications have been proposed to assess the risk of recurrence in patients with localized renal cell cancer treated with nephrectomy [19, 20]. Regarding the role of systemic therapies in localized tumours, several randomized trials failed to demonstrate a consistent reduction in progression-free survival or OS, either with 1-year adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib (ASSURE), pazopanib (PROTECT), axitinib (ATLAS), or 3-year sorafenib (SORCE) [25–30]. Only one study (S-TRAC) has shown a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) in patients who received adjuvant sunitinib for 1 year. This benefit seems to be especially apparent in the group of patients with higher risk features. Mature OS data are not available yet. Moreover, toxicity of sunitinib was considerable in this population [25]. However, differences in population prognostic features and dose intensity of therapy between both studies are remarkable [26, 27]. The European Medicines Agency has not approved adjuvant therapy due to the imbalance between risk and clinical benefit of these drugs.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The printed grade is attached to a different source occurrence.
10heldsupport foundPage 6
Prognostic classifications, such as MSKCC and IMDC (for patient treated with anti-VEGF therapies), should be used for management of mRCC patients.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: II, Grade of recommendation: A
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 6

In patients with metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC), classi-cal anatomical and histological features have limited prog-nostic value. The most important clinical prognostic factor in mRCC is the ECOG performance status. Several prognostic models have been developed to date, but the most widely used are the MSKCC and the IMDC models. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria, derived from studies in the citokines era in 1999 [32] and updated in 2002 [33], identified five variables as risk factors for short survival: time from diagnosis to treatment of < 1 year, Karnofsky performance status < 80%, high serum lactate dehydrogenase, low serum hemoglobin, and high cor-rected serum calcium. These factors were combined to stratify patients into three risk groups with a favorable (0 risk factors), intermediate (1–2 risk factors), or poor (3 or more risk factors) prognosis, with median OS of 30, 14, and 5 months, respec-tively (Table 4). In a retrospective study that included 645 patients treated with anti-VEGF therapies (sunitinib, sorafenib and bevaci-zumab), the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) [34] identified six independent predictors of poor OS: time from diagnosis to treatment of < 1 year, Karnofsky performance status < 80%, low serum hemoglobin, high-cor-rected serum calcium, neutrophilia and thrombocytosis. This model has been also validated with pazopanib [35]. In 2013, an external validation of his model was performed in a series of 1028 patients with mRCC who had been treated with anti-VEGF, and compared with four other prognostic models [36]. The six predefined risk factors were validated as independent predictors of survival. The median OS in the favorable, inter-mediate, and poor-risk groups was 43.2, 22.5, and 7.8 months, respectively (Table 5). Finally, this model has also been vali-dated for patients in second-line therapy after progression to VEGF-targeted agents [37] and for patients with non-clear mRCC [38].

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
11heldsupport nonePage 7
Recommendations • Debulking or cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) should not be considered mandatory in patients with interme- diate–poor IMDC/MSKCC risk who require systemic therapy. Level of evidence: I. Grade of recommendation:
Grade / classnone printed
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • The source block was excluded and requires an eligibility review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible even though no distinct support was selected.
12heldsupport nonePage 7
Debulking or cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) should not be considered mandatory in patients with interme- diate–poor IMDC/MSKCC risk who require systemic therapy. Level of evidence: I. Grade of recommendation: A.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • The source structure requires manual review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible even though no distinct support was selected.
13heldsupport nonePage 7
CN may have a role in the management of mRCC in patients with limited metastatic burden amenable to sur- veillance or metastasectomy, in patients requiring pal- liation, and potentially delayed CN in patients with a favorable response or stable disease after initial systemic therapy. Level of evidence: II. Grade of recommendation: B.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • The source structure requires manual review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible even though no distinct support was selected.
14heldsupport foundPage 7
Metastasectomy can be considered in selected patients with limited number of metastases with long metachro- nous disease-free interval. Level of evidence: II. Grade of recommendation: C.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 7

metastases. Patient selection should be discussed in a mul-tidisciplinary team. Good PS, solitary or oligometastases, metachronous disease with disease-free interval > 2 years, the absence of progression on systemic therapy, low or inter-mediate Fuhrman grade and complete resection have been associated with favorable outcome after local treatment of metastases from RCC.

Why this is held
  • The source structure requires manual review.
15heldsupport foundPage 7
• Considering a decision based on the whole population of patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC, the combi- nation of pembrolizumab–axitinib should be considered the first option, based on the benefit observed in OS over sunitinib
Grade / classLevel of evidence: I, grade of recommendation A
Internal only2 supporting context passages
issuer explanationPage 7

[51]. On the other hand, the combinations of pembrolizumab and axitinib and avelumab–axitinib in patients with previ-ously untreated advanced RCC, resulted in higher objective response rate and progression-free survival than sunitinib.

issuer explanationPage 7

So far, only the combination of pembrolizumab–axitinib has demonstrated a longer OS (HR for death 0.53; P < 0.0001),

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
16heldsupport foundPage 7
Considering a decision based on the whole population of patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC, the combi- nation of pembrolizumab–axitinib should be considered the first option, based on the benefit observed in OS over sunitinib (Level of evidence: I, grade of recommendation A). Until mature results of OS are available, the combina- tion of avelumab–axitinib is recommended as an alterna- tive that increase PFS over antiangiogenic TKI (Level of evidence: I, grade of recommendation B). Sunitinib, pazopanib and tivozanib are reasonable options when the above-mentioned combinations are not available, par- ticularly in patients with good and intermediate IMDC prognosis, based on the longer PFS observed compared to interferon placebo, or sorafenib, respectively (Level of evidence: I, grade of recommendation B). HD-IL2 could be still considered as an option for high-selected patients in centres with experience (Level of evidence: III, grade of recommendation: C) (Fig. 2).
Grade / classnone printed
Internal only5 supporting context passages
issuer explanationPage 7

Immunotherapy has emerged as a new strategy for first-line metastatic RCC. For patients with intermediate and poor IMDC risk, a large phase III trial demonstrated that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was superior to sunitinib in terms of OS (HR for death, 0.63; P < 0.001) and response rate, with a high complete response rate (9%)

issuer explanationPage 7

[51]. On the other hand, the combinations of pembrolizumab and axitinib and avelumab–axitinib in patients with previ-ously untreated advanced RCC, resulted in higher objective response rate and progression-free survival than sunitinib.

issuer explanationPage 7

So far, only the combination of pembrolizumab–axitinib has demonstrated a longer OS (HR for death 0.53; P < 0.0001),

issuer explanationPage 7

whereas the final OS results of avelumab–axitinib, as well as the results of other phase III trials combining VEGFR-TKI and immune checkpoints inhibitors are awaited [52, 53].

issuer explanationPage 7

Finally, high-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL2) remains a viable option in centers with experience for high-selected good-risk patients [54].

Why this is held
  • The source structure requires manual review.
17heldsupport foundPage 7
Until mature results of OS are available, the combina- tion of avelumab–axitinib is recommended as an alterna- tive that increase PFS over antiangiogenic TKI
Grade / classLevel of evidence: I, grade of recommendation B
Internal only2 supporting context passages
issuer explanationPage 7

[51]. On the other hand, the combinations of pembrolizumab and axitinib and avelumab–axitinib in patients with previ-ously untreated advanced RCC, resulted in higher objective response rate and progression-free survival than sunitinib.

issuer explanationPage 7

whereas the final OS results of avelumab–axitinib, as well as the results of other phase III trials combining VEGFR-TKI and immune checkpoints inhibitors are awaited [52, 53].

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
18heldsupport foundPage 7
Sunitinib, pazopanib and tivozanib are reasonable options when the above-mentioned combinations are not available, par- ticularly in patients with good and intermediate IMDC prognosis, based on the longer PFS observed compared to interferon placebo, or sorafenib, respectively
Grade / classLevel of evidence: I, grade of recommendation B
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 7

Four vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents have demonstrated efficacy in phase III trials that included mainly good and intermediate risk patients with clear-cell histology [43–47]. Sunitinib, pazopanib and beva-cizumab plus IFNα significantly improved PFS compared with IFNα or placebo, with median PFS of 8.5-11 months communicated in pivotal trials [43–45]. Furthermore, pazopanib demonstrated not to be inferior to sunitinib in the phase III COMPARZ trial [48]. Tivozanib, a selective VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed supe-riority when compared with sorafenib in a phase III trial, with a median PFS of 11.9 months [47]. Based on these results, these four oral VEGFR-TKIs have become standard of care in these patients. In addition, a fifth VEGFR-TKI,

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
19heldsupport foundPage 7
HD-IL2 could be still considered as an option for high-selected patients in centres with experience
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III, grade of recommendation: C
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 7

Finally, high-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL2) remains a viable option in centers with experience for high-selected good-risk patients [54].

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
20heldsupport foundPage 7
Considering a decision based on IMDC subgroups, the combination of Ipilimumab–nivolumab should be con- sidered the first option for patients with metastatic clear- cell RCC and IMDC intermediate or poor prognosis,
Grade / classnone printed
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 7

Immunotherapy has emerged as a new strategy for first-line metastatic RCC. For patients with intermediate and poor IMDC risk, a large phase III trial demonstrated that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was superior to sunitinib in terms of OS (HR for death, 0.63; P < 0.001) and response rate, with a high complete response rate (9%)

Why this is held
  • The source structure requires manual review.
21heldsupport foundPage 8
For asymptomatic patients with indolent and good-prognosis disease, active surveillance can be considered (Level of evidence II; grade of recommendation: C).
Grade / classLevel of evidence II; grade of recommendation: C
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 8

• No definitive evidence is available on the benefit of the anti PD1/PDL1 plus either ipilimumab or TKI over TKI

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
22heldsupport foundPage 9
• In patients with advanced RCC previously treated with one or two antiangiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, nivolumab and cabozantinib are the recommended options.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 8

The second-line treatment of metastatic RCC dramati-cally changed since 2015 after the report of two differ-ent randomized phase III trials showing improvement in OS with nivolumab [57], an antibody against PD-1, and cabozantinib, an oral TKI targeting VEGFR, MET and AXL [58]. Both drugs were compared with everolimus, included patients previously treated with at least one prior antiangiogenic, and both showed a significant improve-ment in OS (median 25 months, HR: 0.73; P=0.002, and median 21.4 months, HR: 0.58, P<0.001, respectively)

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
23heldsupport foundPage 9
Decisions to use either agent may be based on the expected toxicity and on contraindications for each drug, as randomized data is lacking.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal only1 supporting context passage
practical tipPage 9

nivolumab. In absence of clear prospective data, decisions should be guided by clinical features, efficacy parameters and safety profile. Unfortunately, no valid biomarkers exist

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
24heldsupport foundPage 9
Axitinib, everolimus, lenvatinib plus everolimus, and tivozanib are alternatives for second-line, providing that they are available, and patients cannot receive nivolumab or cabozantinib (level of evidence I. Grade of recom- mendation B).
Grade / classlevel of evidence I. Grade of recom- mendation B
Internal only2 supporting context passages
issuer explanationPage 8

Until recently, either the VEGFR-TKI axitinib [55], or the mTOR inhibitor Everolimus [56] were the standard treat-ment for patients progressing to a previous anti-VEGF treat-ment, based on the results of two-phase III trials of Axitinib vs. sorafenib, and everolimus, vs. placebo. Both trials dem-onstrated a PFS benefit without improvement in OS.

issuer explanationPage 8

regulatory agencies. In addition, in the randomized phase III trial TIVO-3, Tivozanib was superior to Sorafenib in terms of PFS in a population of heavily pretreated patients (25% exposed to prior checkpoint inhibitors) [59]. Furthermore, the combination of lenvatinib, another oral TKI of VEGFR1- 3, FGFR and PDGFR, and everolimus, improved PFS, over everolimus in a randomized phase II study of mRCC patients treated with one previous VEGF-targeted therapy, with high rate of dose reductions due to toxicity [60].

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The strength of the source wording may not have been preserved exactly.
25heldsupport foundPage 9
In addition, they may be also acceptable options following Nivolumab and Cabozantinib. Level of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: C.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: C
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 9

• Axitinib, everolimus, lenvatinib plus everolimus, and tivozanib are alternatives for second-line, providing that they are available, and patients cannot receive nivolumab or cabozantinib (level of evidence I. Grade of recom-

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
26heldsupport foundPage 9
• For patients who progress after initial immunotherapy- based treatment, we suggest treatment with a TKI- VEGFR.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: C
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 9

zanib, sunitinib, and pazopanib. Further research is

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
27heldsupport nonePage 9
Further research is required in this context. Level of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: C.
Grade / classLevel of evidence: III. Grade of recommendation: C
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible but the result was marked recommendation only.
28heldsupport nonePage 9
• Patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials whenever possible.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible even though no distinct support was selected.
29heldsupport recommendation onlyPage 10
• First line: The current evidence is mainly based on small prospective studies and subgroup analyses from larger trials, which mainly focus on TKI or mTOR inhibitor testing. Overall, the most robust data exist for the use of sunitinib.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
  • Only the recommendation was found; the surrounding source needs review.
30heldsupport nonePage 10
Overall, the most robust data exist for the use of sunitinib.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • The source block did not include cited evidence.
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The recommendation wording could not be classified safely.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible but the result was marked recommendation only.
31heldsupport nonePage 10
• Papilar: Standard: Sunitinib [I, B]
Grade / classI, B
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The recommendation wording could not be classified safely.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible even though no distinct support was selected.
32heldsupport nonePage 10
• Cromophobe: Option: Sunitinib [II, C]
Grade / classII, C
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The recommendation wording could not be classified safely.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible even though no distinct support was selected.
33heldsupport foundPage 10
• Collecting duct/Medulary: Option: Cisplatin-based regimen [II, C]
Grade / classII, C
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 10

Although collecting-duct tumours are usually resistant to systemic therapy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is usually recommended.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The recommendation wording could not be classified safely.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
34heldsupport foundPage 10
Sarcomatoid: Option: Nivolumab + ipilimumab [II, B]
Grade / classII, B
Internal only1 supporting context passage
issuer explanationPage 10

Besides these data, it has traditionally been considered that sarcomatoid histologies, tumours of the collecting ducts and medullary renal carcinoma can benefit from chemo-therapy. Two series show its role in sarcomatoid histology:

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The recommendation wording could not be classified safely.
35heldsupport nonePage 10
Genetic’ recommendations can´t be graded, as data are limited and no clear treatment recommendation can be made for these subgroups with distinct biology.
Grade / classnone printed
Internal onlySupporting context

No separate supporting context was found.

Why this is held
  • It is unclear whether the source presents this as an issuer recommendation.
  • The cleaned wording was rejected, so the source wording is being held for review.
  • Adjacent explanatory text is visible but the result was marked recommendation only.

Part 4: Systems of Care: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Circulation · 2025

reviewed 50accepted 50
Executive Summary

This American Heart Association guideline on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care addresses the systems needed to prevent cardiac arrest, recognize it rapidly, deliver effective resuscitation, and support recovery. It follows the Chain of Survival across community, emergency medical services, and hospital settings, with recommendations for early warning systems, rapid response and code teams, lay-rescuer programs, public access naloxone and defibrillation, telecommunicator-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and resuscitation-team composition.

The guideline also covers on-scene resuscitation and transport, specialized cardiac arrest centers, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation systems, organ donation, clinical debriefing, data registries, continuous quality improvement, and long-term survivor support. Each formal recommendation is assigned an American Heart Association Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence so readers can distinguish the expected benefit of an intervention from the certainty and type of evidence supporting it.

Recommendation 50 foundGrade / class
1acceptedsupport nonePage 16
Early warning score (EWS) systems can be beneficial to detect clinical deterioration, prompt an assessment, and facilitate intervention or transfer to a higher level of care.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-R
2acceptedsupport nonePage 16
Rapid response teams (RRTs) or medical emergency teams (METs) can be effective in reducing the incidence of cardiac arrest, particularly in general care wards.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
3acceptedsupport nonePage 16
Implementation of safety huddles to improve situational awareness of high-risk hospitalized patients and mitigate deterioration can be effective in reducing cardiac arrest rates.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
4acceptedsupport nonePage 20
Public policies should allow for possession, use, and immunity from civil and criminal liability for good faith administration of naloxone by lay rescuers.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence B-NR
5acceptedsupport nonePage 20
Naloxone distribution programs can be beneficial to increase naloxone availability among lay rescuers and decrease mortality from opioid-related overdose.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
6acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Implementing a bundle of community initiatives is a reasonable strategy to improve lay rescuer response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
7acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Increasing the availability of instructor-led training in communities can be effective to improve lay rescuer response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
8acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Mobile technologies to summon responders to nearby out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) events is a reasonable strategy to increase timely lay rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
9acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Mass media campaigns may be considered to promote learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills in all populations.
Grade / classClass 2b, Level of Evidence C-LD
10acceptedsupport nonePage 24
It may be reasonable for communities to implement policies that require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification in the general public.
Grade / classClass 2b, Level of Evidence C-LD
11acceptedsupport nonePage 28
If the patient is unresponsive with abnormal, agonal, or absent breathing, the telecommunicator should assume that the patient is in cardiac arrest.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence C-LD
12acceptedsupport nonePage 28
Telecommunicators should determine the location of the event before questioning to identify out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), to allow for simultaneous dispatching of emergency medical services (EMS) response.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence C-EO
13acceptedsupport nonePage 30
Telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) instructions for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) should advise compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) consistent with adult basic life support (BLS) guidelines.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence A
14acceptedsupport nonePage 30
Telecommunicators should instruct callers to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for individuals with suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence C-LD
15acceptedsupport nonePage 30
Telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) instructions for infants and children experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) should advise conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with breaths consistent with pediatric basic life support (BLS) guidelines.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence C-LD
16acceptedsupport nonePage 33
Telecommunicator recognition of cardiac arrest and telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) instructions should be reviewed and evaluated as part of an emergency medical services (EMS) system quality management process.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence B-NR
17acceptedsupport nonePage 34
Video-based dispatch systems for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) response may be reasonable in systems with such capabilities.
Grade / classClass 2b, Level of Evidence B-NR
18acceptedsupport nonePage 37
Performance-focused debriefing of rescuers after cardiac arrest can be effective for resuscitation improvement programs.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
19acceptedsupport nonePage 37
Review of objective and quantitative resuscitation data can be effective in improving the quality of postevent debriefing for adults and children.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
20acceptedsupport nonePage 37
It is reasonable for debriefings to be facilitated by health care professionals familiar with established debriefing processes.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence C-LD
21acceptedsupport nonePage 37
Incorporating immediate and delayed debriefing is reasonable and may identify different opportunities for system improvement.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence C-EO
22acceptedsupport nonePage 40
It can be beneficial to have an advanced life support–level clinician present during the resuscitation of a person with suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
23acceptedsupport nonePage 40
It is reasonable to ensure that emergency medical services (EMS) systems have a team size sufficient to achieve discretely assigned roles within the team.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
24acceptedsupport nonePage 43
In-hospital code teams should comprise members with advanced life support (ALS) training.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence B-NR
25acceptedsupport nonePage 43
Designated or dedicated code teams with clearly defined roles, diverse expertise, and adequate training incorporating simulation can be beneficial in improving patient outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
26acceptedsupport nonePage 45
Emergency medical services (EMS) systems should be prepared to perform termination of resuscitation (TOR) on scene, including death notification training for EMS professionals.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence B-NR
27acceptedsupport nonePage 45
Prioritizing on-scene resuscitation focused on achieving sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) prior to initiation of transport for most adults and children experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) can be beneficial in the absence of special circumstances.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-NR
28acceptedsupport nonePage 47
We recommend that public access defibrillation (PAD) programs be implemented in communities at high risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence B-NR
29acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Transport of resuscitated patients to specialized cardiac arrest centers when comprehensive postarrest care is not available at local facilities may be reasonable.
Grade / classClass 2b, Level of Evidence B-R
30acceptedsupport nonePage 52
It is reasonable that centers with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) programs develop and frequently reassess patient selection criteria to maximize cardiac arrest survival, ensure equitable access, and limit futility.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence C-LD
31acceptedsupport nonePage 53
It is reasonable that clinicians performing adult peripheral extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) cannulation be experienced in percutaneous technique.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence C-LD
32acceptedsupport nonePage 53
A regionalized approach to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is reasonable to optimize outcomes and resource utilization.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence C-LD
33acceptedsupport nonePage 53
Rapid intra-arrest transport for the purposes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) may be considered for limited, highly selected adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.
Grade / classClass 2b, Level of Evidence B-R
34acceptedsupport nonePage 57
We recommend that all patients who are resuscitated from cardiac arrest but who subsequently meet neurologic criteria for death or have planned withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies be evaluated for organ donation.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence B-NR
35acceptedsupport nonePage 57
Institutions should develop a system of care (SOC) focused on facilitating and evaluating organ donation after cardiac arrest consistent with local legal and regulatory requirements.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence C-EO
36acceptedsupport nonePage 57
Patients who do not have return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after resuscitation efforts and who would otherwise have termination of resuscitation efforts may be considered candidates for donation in settings where such programs exist.
Grade / classClass 2b, Level of Evidence B-NR
37acceptedsupport nonePage 59
Organizations that treat cardiac arrest patients should collect processes-of-care data and outcomes to guide system improvement.
Grade / classClass 1, Level of Evidence B-NR
38acceptedsupport nonePage 61
The recovery and long-term functional outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors are likely to benefit from the use of integrated systems that assess patients prior to discharge, reassess their needs after discharge, and address these needs on an ongoing basis during recovery.
Grade / classClass 2a, Level of Evidence B-R
39acceptedsupport nonePage 63
Although the clinical effectiveness of community cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) programs is well established, defining the cost effectiveness of implementation in specific populations and settings requires further study.
Grade / classnone printed
40acceptedsupport nonePage 63
Mobile technologies hold considerable promise as a means to engage lay rescuers in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, however, the optimal implementation of these technologies requires further research.
Grade / classnone printed
41acceptedsupport nonePage 63
As mobile technologies are implemented, potential risks to privacy, liability, and personal safety during lay rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in an unknown location need to be understood.
Grade / classnone printed
42acceptedsupport nonePage 63
Preliminary studies on drone delivery of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are promising. However, the use of a drone network as part of a community cardiac arrest system of care (SOC) requires cost-effectiveness analysis and research to define its application in real-world situations and its impact on patient outcomes.
Grade / classnone printed
43acceptedsupport nonePage 63
Further research is needed to better comprehend the barriers, challenges, and benefits of integrating out-of-hospital and in-hospital datasets as part of quality improvement programs within systems of care (SOC).
Grade / classnone printed
44acceptedsupport nonePage 63
While growing evidence supports the benefits of regionalized systems of care (SOC) for time-sensitive emergencies (eg, stroke, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), cardiac arrest centers (CACs) require better definition, including research to identify which components confer benefit and to determine whether delivery of these components justifies the requisite transport time.
Grade / classnone printed
45acceptedsupport nonePage 63 Page 64
Further studies are needed to understand how telecommunicators can better recognize cardiac arrest, particularly in pediatric patients, and how their instructions can be delivered to optimize lay rescuer participation and delivery of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Research to identify age cutoffs and etiologies for which individuals in cardiac arrest benefit from full CPR with breaths, as opposed to compression-only CPR, is needed.
Grade / classnone printed
46acceptedsupport nonePage 64
The timing, methods, and specific components of feedback or debriefing after attempted cardiac arrest resuscitation require further study.
Grade / classnone printed
47acceptedsupport nonePage 64
Research is needed to identify which patients warrant transport to a hospital with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to define the safest means to do so while maintaining high-quality CPR.
Grade / classnone printed
48acceptedsupport nonePage 64
Further research is needed to identify the patient characteristics wherein rapid response team/medical emergency team (RRT/MET) programs provide the greatest outcome benefits, which interventions are most efficacious, and whether RRT/MET programs should be linked to an automated early warning score (EWS).
Grade / classnone printed
49acceptedsupport nonePage 64
Research is needed on how to apply behavior and leadership skill training to code teams and emergency medical services (EMS) systems to optimize resuscitation.
Grade / classnone printed
50acceptedsupport nonePage 64
Compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is easier to implement because of its simplicity and reduced contact but may be less efficacious than CPR with breaths in some etiologies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (eg, opioid-associated OHCA). Research is needed to define whether specific etiologies of OHCA warrant distinct telecommunicator instructions.
Grade / classnone printed

Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Antithrombotic Therapy for Vascular Diseases.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2023

reviewed 109accepted 109
Executive Summary

This is the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Clinical Practice Guideline on Antithrombotic Therapy for Vascular Diseases, the first ESVS guideline dedicated specifically to antithrombotic therapy. It is intended for the multidisciplinary clinicians who care for adult patients with vascular diseases, including angiologists, cardiologists, interventional radiologists, haematologists, neurologists, phlebologists, vascular physicians, and vascular surgeons. The guideline covers antithrombotic management across a broad range of arterial and venous conditions, including atherosclerotic carotid, vertebral, upper limb, renal/mesenteric, and lower extremity arterial disease, non-atherosclerotic peripheral artery diseases, arterial embolism, aneurysmal disease (abdominal aortic and popliteal), arterial dissection, vascular access for haemodialysis, and specific populations such as chronic kidney disease, cancer-associated thromboembolism, and thrombophilia, as well as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis, superficial vein thrombosis, cancer-associated VTE, post-venous intervention, and congenital vascular malformations. Major domains addressed include pharmacology of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, monitoring of antithrombotic effect, bleeding risk assessment and risk reduction (including the new OAC3-PAD score), peri-procedural and long-term antithrombotic strategies for medical therapy and for open or endovascular intervention, VTE prophylaxis, and treatment pathways for venous disease. The guideline explicitly excludes intracerebral and coronary arterial territories, and acknowledges important evidence limitations: many recommendations rely on consensus or low-certainty evidence, RCT populations are at lower bleeding risk than real-world patients, definitions of major bleeding are heterogeneous across trials, validated bleeding risk scores for PAD are lacking, and several areas have insufficient RCT data. Key concepts needed to interpret the recommendations include single and dual antiplatelet therapy, low-dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin, vitamin K antagonists with target INR, direct oral anticoagulants, unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, proton pump inhibitor gastroprotection, the COMPASS and VOYAGER high-bleeding-risk criteria, and the distinction between primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention.

Recommendation 109 foundGrade / class
1acceptedsupport nonePage 12
Patients being prescribed antithrombotic therapy are recommended to have a bleeding risk assessment performed to aid shared decision making.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
2acceptedsupport nonePage 12
Patients with a modifiable risk of bleeding being prescribed antithrombotic therapy are recommended to have adequate management to limit the corresponding bleeding risk.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
3acceptedsupport nonePage 12
Patients taking antithrombotic therapy with a history of upper digestive tract lesions, or who are at higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, should be considered for proton pump inhibitor therapy to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
4acceptedsupport nonePage 16
Patients receiving unfractionated heparin infusions are recommended to have the activated partial thromboplastin time or activated partial thromboplastin time ratio monitored to reduce the risk of bleeding.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
5acceptedsupport nonePage 17
Patients undergoing open or endovascular arterial intervention being administered a bolus of unfractionated heparin may be considered for activated partial thromboplastin time, activated partial thromboplastin time ratio or activated clotting time monitoring as a measure of anticoagulation.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
6acceptedsupport nonePage 20
Patients with asymptomatic > 50% carotid artery stenoses are recommended to be offered aspirin (75 – 325 mg) to reduce the risk of secondary cardiovascular events.
Grade / classClass I, Level B
7acceptedsupport nonePage 21
Patients with asymptomatic > 50% carotid artery stenoses who are intolerant or allergic to aspirin should be offered clopidogrel (75 mg) to reduce the risk of secondary cardiovascular events. If allergic to both aspirin and clopidogrel, dipyridamole (200 mg twice daily) should be considered.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
8acceptedsupport nonePage 22
Patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke with any degree of carotid artery stenosis not undergoing carotid endarterectomy or stenting are recommended to have dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (75 – 325 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) for 21 days followed by clopidogrel 75 mg, or long term aspirin (75 – 100 mg) plus dipyridamole (200 mg twice daily) to reduce the risk of stroke.
Grade / classClass I, Level A
9acceptedsupport nonePage 22
Patients intolerant or allergic to clopidogrel with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke with any degree of carotid artery stenosis not undergoing carotid endarterectomy or stenting should be considered for dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor (30 days) or aspirin and dipyridamole (14 days) as an alternative to aspirin and clopidogrel to reduce the risk of stroke.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
10acceptedsupport nonePage 22
Protocols for antiplatelet therapy for symptomatic patients prior to carotid endarterectomy or stenting should be made by local teams. Doses should follow the major randomised trial regimens.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
11acceptedsupport nonePage 22
Patients who are to undergo carotid endarterectomy are recommended to have antiplatelet therapy before the procedure, in the peri-operative period, and over the long term.
Grade / classClass I, Level A
12acceptedsupport nonePage 22
Patients with a > 50% carotid stenosis experiencing transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke awaiting carotid endarterectomy are recommended for early institution of antiplatelet therapy to reduce recurrent stroke risk.
Grade / classClass I, Level B
13acceptedsupport nonePage 22
Recently symptomatic patients who are to undergo carotid endarterectomy should be considered for dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (75 – 325 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) peri-operatively to reduce recurrent stroke risk.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
14acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Recently symptomatic patients who are to undergo carotid endarterectomy for whom antiplatelet monotherapy is preferred should be considered for aspirin (300 – 325 mg daily) for 14 days followed by lower doses (75 – 162 mg daily) to reduce the recurrent stroke risk.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
15acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Patients who are to undergo carotid endarterectomy are recommended to preferentially have low dose aspirin (75 – 325 mg daily) rather than higher doses to reduce recurrent stroke risk.
Grade / classClass I, Level B
16acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Patients scheduled for carotid artery stenting for carotid stenosis are recommended to have dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin (75 – 325 mg) plus clopidogrel (75 mg) to reduce recurrent stroke risk. Clopidogrel should be started at least three days before stenting or as a single 300 mg loading dose in urgent cases.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
17acceptedsupport nonePage 23
Patients undergoing carotid artery stenting are recommended to have dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel continued for at least four weeks after carotid stenting, then clopidogrel 75 mg continued indefinitely to reduce stroke risk.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
18acceptedsupport nonePage 24
Patients with ischaemic cerebral events both undergoing and not undergoing carotid intervention are not recommended to have dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel long term as it confers no benefit over single antiplatelet therapy but increases the bleeding risk.
Grade / classClass III, Level A
19acceptedsupport nonePage 24
Patients with chronic symptomatic upper limb arterial disease should be considered for single antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
20acceptedsupport nonePage 25
Patients post-revascularisation for upper limb atherosclerotic arterial disease are recommended to have an individualised antithrombotic strategy balancing risks and benefits to reduce the risk of secondary cardiovascular and limb events.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
21acceptedsupport nonePage 26
Patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic > 50% atherosclerotic renal or mesenteric artery stenotic disease should be considered for single antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
22acceptedsupport nonePage 26
Patients post-revascularisation for atherosclerotic renal or mesenteric artery disease who are not at high risk of bleeding should be considered for a short course (minimum of one to maximum six months) dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 75 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg) to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
23acceptedsupport nonePage 26
Patients with isolated asymptomatic lower extremity artery disease are not recommended to have aspirin for cardiovascular prevention.
Grade / classClass III, Level A
24acceptedsupport nonePage 27
Patients with chronic symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease are recommended to have single antiplatelet therapy for secondary cardiovascular prevention.
Grade / classClass I, Level A
25acceptedsupport nonePage 27
Patients with chronic symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease should be considered for clopidogrel (75 mg) as the first choice antiplatelet agent when single antiplatelet therapy is indicated for secondary cardiovascular prevention.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
26acceptedsupport nonePage 28
Patients with chronic symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease are not recommended to have dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary cardiovascular prevention.
Grade / classClass III, Level B
27acceptedsupport nonePage 28
Patients with chronic lower extremity arterial disease with no other indication for anticoagulation are not recommended to have full dose anticoagulation for secondary cardiovascular prevention.
Grade / classClass III, Level A
28acceptedsupport nonePage 29
Patients with chronic symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease who are not at high risk of bleeding, especially those at higher ischaemic risk, should be considered for aspirin (75 – 100 mg once daily) in combination with rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for secondary cardiovascular and major adverse limb event risk reduction.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
29acceptedsupport nonePage 29
Patients with acute limb ischaemia are recommended to have immediate intravenous unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin to reduce the risk of thrombus propagation.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
30acceptedsupport nonePage 29
Patients with acute limb ischaemia planned for expedited revascularisation are recommended to have immediate intravenous unfractionated heparin to reduce the risk of thrombus propagation.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
31acceptedsupport nonePage 30
Patients undergoing endovascular arterial intervention are recommended to have a single bolus of intravenous or intra-arterial unfractionated (50 – 100 IU/kg) or low molecular weight (0.5 mg/kg) heparin to reduce the risk of peri-operative acute limb events.
Grade / classClass I, Level B
32acceptedsupport nonePage 30
Patients undergoing open arterial surgery should be considered for a single bolus of intravenous or intra-arterial unfractionated heparin (50 – 100 IU/kg) to reduce the risk of peri-operative acute limb events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
33acceptedsupport nonePage 30
Patients undergoing endovascular or open arterial surgery may be considered for intra-operative activated partial thromboplastin time, activated partial thromboplastin time ratio, or activated clotting time measurement to guide further doses or reversal of unfractionated heparin.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
34acceptedsupport nonePage 31
Patients undergoing endovascular arterial intervention may be considered for a single dose of bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg) as an alternative to heparin to reduce the risk of peri-operative acute limb events.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level B
35acceptedsupport nonePage 31
Patients undergoing endovascular intervention for lower extremity arterial disease who are not at high risk of bleeding may be considered for a short course (a minimum of one to maximum six months) dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 75 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg) to reduce the risk of secondary cardiovascular and major adverse limb events.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
36acceptedsupport nonePage 32
Patients undergoing endovascular intervention for lower extremity arterial disease who are not at high risk of bleeding should be considered for aspirin (75 – 100 mg once daily) combined with rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) to reduce the risk of secondary cardiovascular and major adverse limb events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
37acceptedsupport nonePage 32
If clopidogrel (75 mg) is added in exceptional circumstances to aspirin (75 – 100 mg once daily) in combination with rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for patients undergoing endovascular intervention for lower extremity arterial disease who are not at high risk of bleeding, it is not recommended for longer than 30 days as the bleeding risk is likely to outweigh the benefit.
Grade / classClass III, Level C
38acceptedsupport nonePage 34
Patients undergoing infrainguinal endarterectomy or bypass using autologous vein or prosthetic conduit for lower extremity arterial disease who are not at high risk of bleeding should be considered for aspirin (75 – 100 mg once daily) in combination with rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) to reduce the risk of secondary cardiovascular and major adverse limb events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
39acceptedsupport nonePage 34
If clopidogrel (75 mg) is added in exceptional circumstances to aspirin (75 – 100 mg once daily) in combination with rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery using autologous vein or prosthetic conduit for lower extremity arterial disease who are not at high risk of bleeding, it is not recommended for longer than 30 days as the bleeding risk is likely to outweigh the benefit.
Grade / classClass III, Level C
40acceptedsupport nonePage 34
Patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass with autologous vein for lower extremity arterial disease who are not at high risk of bleeding may be considered for vitamin K antagonists to improve graft patency.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level A
41acceptedsupport nonePage 34
Patients taking a vitamin K antagonist to improve patency of an infrainguinal vein bypass graft should have an international normalised ratio of 2.0 – 3.0 with a target of 2.5.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
42acceptedsupport nonePage 34
Patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery with a prosthetic conduit for lower extremity arterial disease may be considered for single antiplatelet therapy to improve graft patency.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level B
43acceptedsupport nonePage 34
Patients at high risk of bleeding undergoing infrainguinal bypass using an autologous vein or prosthetic conduit for lower extremity arterial disease may be considered for single antiplatelet therapy to improve graft patency.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
44acceptedsupport nonePage 36
Patients experiencing arterial embolus of unknown origin who are not at high risk of bleeding may be considered for long term therapeutic anticoagulation to reduce the risk of recurrent embolic events.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
45acceptedsupport nonePage 37
Patients with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm may be considered for aspirin (75 – 100 mg) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
46acceptedsupport nonePage 37
Patients undergoing endovascular or open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair should be considered for aspirin (75 – 100 mg) following repair to reduce the risk of secondary cardiovascular events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
47acceptedsupport nonePage 38
Patients with popliteal aneurysms should be considered for single antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of major adverse limb events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
48acceptedsupport nonePage 38
Patients undergoing open popliteal aneurysm repair may be considered for single antiplatelet therapy post-operatively to reduce the risk of major adverse limb events.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
49acceptedsupport nonePage 38
Patients with extracranial carotid or vertebral artery dissection are recommended to have single antiplatelet therapy for at least three months to reduce the risk of subsequent ischaemic stroke.
Grade / classClass I, Level B
50acceptedsupport nonePage 38
Patients with isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection should be considered for single antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of ischaemic small bowel events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
51acceptedsupport nonePage 39
Patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula or graft formation are not recommended to have systemic unfractionated heparin because of the increased risk of bleeding and lack of benefit for patency.
Grade / classClass III, Level A
52acceptedsupport nonePage 39
Patients undergoing formation of an arteriovenous fistula should be considered for clopidogrel (75 mg) for up to six months as the first line antiplatelet agent to improve fistula patency.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
53acceptedsupport nonePage 39
Patients undergoing formation of an arteriovenous fistula may be considered for aspirin (75 – 100 mg) for up to six months to improve fistula patency if clopidogrel is contraindicated.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level A
54acceptedsupport nonePage 39
Patients undergoing formation of a non-autologous arteriovenous graft may be considered for single antiplatelet therapy for up to six months to improve graft patency.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
55acceptedsupport nonePage 40
Patients with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m2) requiring anticoagulation for a peripheral arterial disease indication may be considered for direct oral anticoagulants, and patients with a glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/ 1.73m2, may be considered for vitamin K antagonists; however, the risk balance is complex and must be strictly individualised.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
56acceptedsupport nonePage 40
Patients with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m2) requiring anticoagulation for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism should be considered for direct oral anticoagulants.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
57acceptedsupport nonePage 41
Patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3 or 4 (estimated glomerular filtration rates from 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73m2) requiring anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin should be considered for regular monitoring of renal function and dose adjustment to reduce the risk of bleeding.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
58acceptedsupport nonePage 42
Patients with chronic peripheral artery disease and a cardiac or vascular indication for full dose anticoagulation are not recommended to have antiplatelet therapy routinely added to anticoagulation.
Grade / classClass III, Level B
59acceptedsupport nonePage 42
Patients taking antiplatelet therapy for any peripheral arterial disease indication should have the antiplatelet therapy stopped if full dose anticoagulation becomes indicated for another reason.
Grade / classClass III, Level B
60acceptedsupport nonePage 42
Patients with a pre-existing indication for full dose anticoagulation undergoing endovascular intervention may be exceptionally considered for the addition of single antiplatelet therapy for a maximum of three months to reduce the risk of subsequent ischaemic events.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
61acceptedsupport nonePage 42
Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome presenting with an arterial embolic event are recommended to have anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists with a target INR of 2 – 3 to reduce the risk of future thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
62acceptedsupport nonePage 44
Patients undergoing any vascular procedure are recommended to have an individually personalised venous thromboembolism risk assessment.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
63acceptedsupport nonePage 44
Patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis are recommended to have a three month course of a full dose direct oral anticoagulant rather than a vitamin K antagonist to reduce the risk of recurrent thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass I, Level A
64acceptedsupport nonePage 45
Patients with a proximal deep vein thrombosis requiring extended anticoagulation following the principal three month treatment phase should be considered for full dose direct oral anticoagulants rather than vitamin K antagonists to reduce the risk of further thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
65acceptedsupport nonePage 45
Patients with unprovoked deep vein thrombosis who are eligible for anticoagulants are not recommended to have aspirin for extended antithrombotic therapy to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass III, Level A
66acceptedsupport nonePage 45
Patients with a first episode of unprovoked proximal deep vein thrombosis not deemed to be at high risk of recurrence should be considered for reduced dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) after the principal three month treatment phase to reduce the risk of further thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
67acceptedsupport nonePage 47
Patients with lower limb superficial vein thrombosis ≥ 3 cm away from the junction with the deep veins and extending ≥ 5 cm in length are recommended to have fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily for 45 days to reduce the risk of further thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass I, Level B
68acceptedsupport nonePage 47
Patients with lower limb superficial vein thrombosis ≥ 3 cm away from the junction with the deep veins and extending ≥ 5 cm in length should be considered for rivaroxaban 10 mg or an intermediate dose of a low molecular weight heparin once daily as an alternative to fondaparinux to reduce the risk of further thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
69acceptedsupport nonePage 48
Patients with lower limb superficial vein thrombosis ≤ 3 cm from the junction with the deep veins are recommended to have three months of full dose anticoagulation to reduce the risk of further thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
70acceptedsupport nonePage 48
Patients with superficial vein thrombosis of the leg who exhibit high risk clinical and or anatomical features (such as clinically extensive superficial vein thrombosis involving both the calf and the thigh, absence of local pain, superficial axial vein thrombosis or multiple thrombosed venous sites) may be considered for a three month (rather than 45 day) course of intermediate dose anticoagulation to reduce the risk of further thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
71acceptedsupport nonePage 48
Patients with cancer associated venous thromboembolism are recommended to have anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin to reduce the risk of further thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass I, Level A
72acceptedsupport nonePage 48
Patients with cancer associated venous thromboembolism and a low risk of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding are recommended to be considered for anticoagulation with a direct oral anticoagulant preferably apixaban, alternatively rivaroxaban or edoxaban.
Grade / classClass I, Level A
73acceptedsupport nonePage 48
Patients with superficial venous incompetence undergoing high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein who are thought to be at higher risk of deep vein thrombosis should be considered for thromboprophylaxis with a low molecular weight heparin to prevent post-operative venous thromboembolism.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level B
74acceptedsupport nonePage 49
Patients with superficial venous incompetence undergoing endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein who are thought to be at higher risk of deep vein thrombosis should be considered for thromboprophylaxis with a low molecular weight heparin to prevent post-operative venous thromboembolism.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
75acceptedsupport nonePage 49
Patients undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting for deep venous disease should be considered for an individualised antithrombotic regimen considering the risk of bleeding associated with more aggressive antithrombotic strategies.
Grade / classClass IIa, Level C
76acceptedsupport nonePage 49
Patients undergoing intervention for deep vein thrombosis (with or without stenting) are recommended to have a duration of anticoagulation at least as long as standard treatment following deep vein thrombosis to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events.
Grade / classClass I, Level C
77acceptedsupport nonePage 49
Patients with extensive venous malformation or Klippel Trenaunay syndrome with evidence of localised intravascular coagulopathy confirmed by low fibrinogen and high D dimer levels may be considered for prophylactic anticoagulation (low molecular weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulant) for 10 days before, and 20 days after, any invasive procedure to prevent progression to disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Grade / classClass IIb, Level C
78acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Patients with venous malformation associated coagulopathy are not recommended to have antiplatelet agents to prevent progression to disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Grade / classClass III, Level C
79acceptedsupport nonePage 14
Anti-factor Xa monitoring is not necessary, except in obese patients and particularly in those with renal failure.
Grade / classnone printed
80acceptedsupport nonePage 14
Its long half life of around 17 hours permits once daily injections of 2.5 mg for prophylaxis, but requires anti-factor Xa monitoring in chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Grade / classnone printed
81acceptedsupport nonePage 15
As a consequence, overlapping heparin treatment is mandatory in most cases when initially starting a VKA, except for atrial fibrillation.
Grade / classnone printed
82acceptedsupport nonePage 15
Additionally, dabigatran is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein drug transporter, therefore its use should be monitored and it should not be used together with medications that inhibit or induce P-glycoprotein such as ketoconazole, amiodarone, and quinidine. It is eliminated renally so its use should be monitored in patients with renal dysfunction (Table 6).
Grade / classnone printed
83acceptedsupport nonePage 15
While immediate reversal may be necessary in emergency situations before endovascular procedures, stopping a DOAC 48 hours prior to the procedure is usually sufficient for elective procedures.
Grade / classnone printed
84acceptedsupport nonePage 24
There have been no specific trials evaluating the effect of antiplatelet therapy in patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic vertebral stenosis; however, given their risk profile, it is reasonable to adopt the same recommendation strategy as for carotid disease.
Grade / classnone printed
85acceptedsupport nonePage 36
In line with recommendations in section 4, antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is generally not recommended for asymptomatic disease. Following intervention it is reasonable to follow the recommendations in section 4.5.5.
Grade / classnone printed
86acceptedsupport nonePage 40
Finally, when heparin is used for patients with CKD, dose adjustment must be performed as per local protocol as there is no randomised evidence for dose adjustment. Therefore, expert opinion practice recommends decreasing the initial standard dose by 33%, and subsequent dose adjustment should be based on APTT levels.
Grade / classnone printed
87acceptedsupport nonePage 42
Decisions for both investigating potential thrombophilia, and subsequent antithrombotic therapy, should therefore only be made with a specialist haematologist. If there is no clear precipitating event for an embolus, consideration for thrombophilia testing should only be performed after three months of anticoagulation, if at all. There is clear consensus that testing should be highly selective to avoid misdiagnosis and potential overtreatment, so should only be performed by a specialist in this area.
Grade / classnone printed
88acceptedsupport nonePage 44
Likewise, patients who are at very high risk of VTE not on aggressive regimens should be considered for longer courses (up to six weeks post-operatively) of prophylactic LMWH.
Grade / classnone printed
89acceptedsupport nonePage 44
Finally, patients with deep vein thrombosis and antiphospholipid syndrome who are triple positive or have a history of arterial or small vessel thrombosis, are not recommended to be treated with direct oral anticoagulants; a VKA should be used instead. DOACs and particularly apixaban or dabigatran may be an appropriate option for low risk APS patients (single or double antibody positive), pending further evidence.
Grade / classnone printed
90acceptedsupport nonePage 48
Antithrombotic therapy is continued post-operatively, with indefinite anticoagulation recommended for most post-thrombotic patients.
Grade / classnone printed
91acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Patient centred trial design for future trials of antithrombotic therapy.
Grade / classnone printed
92acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Work to define and standardise composite endpoints for RCTs of antithrombotic therapy.
Grade / classnone printed
93acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Work to standardise antithrombotics protocols in RCTs for other areas of vascular intervention such as new endovascular technology. Core outcome and measurement sets would achieve this aim.
Grade / classnone printed
94acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Work to facilitate RCT research in more vascular registries internationally.
Grade / classnone printed
95acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Development and validation of bleeding risk assessment tools for patients with PAD and venous disease.
Grade / classnone printed
96acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Better definitions and quantification of major bleeding considering the patient perspective.
Grade / classnone printed
97acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Definitions of net benefit – the difference between risks and benefits, again taking multiple stakeholder opinions into account.
Grade / classnone printed
98acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Further clinical studies on the impact of testing for, and then treating high on treatment platelet reactivity for patients with PAD, focussing on patients with a higher risk of thrombotic events (post-intervention and factors listed in Table 9).
Grade / classnone printed
99acceptedsupport nonePage 50
RCTs examining antiplatelet regimens, especially dual antiplatelets, before, during and after carotid intervention for symptomatic stenoses. Crescendo TIA should be included.
Grade / classnone printed
100acceptedsupport nonePage 50
Further RCTs on high ischaemic risk asymptomatic PAD groups to understand any potential magnitude of the effects of antithrombotics other than aspirin.
Grade / classnone printed
101acceptedsupport nonePage 51
Further clinical studies on high ischaemic risk chronic symptomatic LEAD groups to understand any comparative magnitude of antithrombotics, especially clopidogrel vs. aspirin plus low dose rivaroxaban.
Grade / classnone printed
102acceptedsupport nonePage 51
RCTs comparing single antiplatelet, dual antiplatelets, and antiplatelet plus low dose anticoagulants after endovascular intervention for LEAD. Focus on high risk groups.
Grade / classnone printed
103acceptedsupport nonePage 51
RCTs comparing combinations of antiplatelet and anticoagulant following lower limb bypass for LEAD. Focus on high risk groups as well as stratification by arterial territory such as below the knee.
Grade / classnone printed
104acceptedsupport nonePage 51
RCTs examining the role of antithrombotic therapy for patients with AAA. The most urgent need is for secondary cardiovascular prevention and expansion for patients with small AAA.
Grade / classnone printed
105acceptedsupport nonePage 51
Cohort or randomised studies on isolated thrombus within the aorta or aortic stent grafts.
Grade / classnone printed
106acceptedsupport nonePage 51
Clinical studies on the effect of antithrombotic therapy before, during, and after venous stenting. Research collaborations may be the best way to achieve this between high volume practitioners.
Grade / classnone printed
107acceptedsupport nonePage 51
For patients with SVT, further research should investigate the effectiveness of intermediate doses of LMWHs in reducing VTE (DVT and or PE) vs. placebo.
Grade / classnone printed
108acceptedsupport nonePage 51
RCTs should be performed to inform clinical practice regarding the optimum treatment duration for patients with SVT near a junction with the deep veins.
Grade / classnone printed
109acceptedsupport nonePage 51
Further RCTs are required to provide a higher level of evidence for duration of extended anticoagulation following SVT.
Grade / classnone printed